By: Rob Bright

Rob Bright — Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:08:00 +0000

Robert Wager is a well known peddler of antiscience gibberish and industry propaganda for the agrochemical/ biotech industry. He is a fraud and a charlatan whose only job is to misinform the public, spread industry pseudoscience, and to defend and promote his corporate masters. He has no credibility and even less personal integrity. He has been trolling social media articles like this one in order to promote and defend GMOs for at least ten years. Truly a sad and pathetic corporate meat puppet…

By: razorjack

razorjack — Sun, 15 Oct 2017 17:52:00 +0000

Wager has posted industry spin and prophaganda. The IARC only uses peer reviewed studies. There are many industry sympathizers who would like them to lower their scientific standards and look at non-published non-peer reviewed studies. Many of these studies are of lesser quality and many have been manipulated by industry to support their junk pseudo-science agenda. The IARC did the right thing by upholding their strict quality requirements for the studies they consider.

Why would you want to see junk science used to make decisions instead of upholding the quality requirements of the IARC, which is the foremost cancer research agency on the planet?

In Germany the BfSR has been found to be guilty of plagiarism when it used Monsanto written language in it’s report. http://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/17898

The EFSA has also been exposed for using industry written language in it’s reports.

The fact show that Regulators ignored many peer reviewed studies
on endocrine disruption.
http://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/17869

Monsanto’s own scientists told them Roundup/glyphosate caused cancer over 35 years ago. Instead of disclosing that fact, they colluded with the EPA who approved glyphosate over the objections of their own staff scientists and called the science “inconvenient” and hid the science away from other scientists, the courts, and the people as a trade secret while at the same time telling us it was safe.

Both the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the World Health Organization have declared glyphosate to be a probable human carcinogen.

A recent peer review scientific study posted on the Nature website shows that Roundup causes fatty liver disease at concentrations over 430,000 times lower than the contamination allowed in the food supply.

Monsanto’s 1981 glyphosate study in rats by Lankas & Hogan shows that Glyphosate causes malignant LYMPHOMA … Glyphosate-induced Malignant Lymphoma particularly in the female rats. These malignant lymphomas were found ONLY in the treated animals and found in fourteen different types of tissue. The controls animals did not have any lymphomas. https://oehha.ca.gov/media/dockets/8594/8767-anthony_samsel/glyphosate_lymphoma_female_rats_1981.pdf

Monsanto study with 240 rats in their 2-year feeding trial concluded in 1990, which is called “Stout and Ruecker” in the literature. The data from this are revealed in the 1991 EPA memo and in Greim (2015) and clearly show cause for concern which was swept under the rug in the 1991 memo. Three EPA toxicologists also did not concur with the conclusions and did not sign the memo.

Comments on: Glyphosate : Monsanto has established a link with cancer

By: Rob Bright

By: razorjack

By: RobertWager