Titanic | The Siver Times

The 10 deadliest movies, the hemoglobin budget has exploded!

sivertime — Tue, 09 May 2017 15:54:46 +0000

If you’re in a macabre mood and you’re kissing the cinema, then you’ve always asked yourself this question: what are the films where it zigouille most?
Cinema has always kissed torrents of blood. Death in cinema is a bit like lying in politics: indissociable. And to prove it, here is the list of the 10 most deadly movies, established by the site moviebodycounts.com. Mass murder movies that made the hemoglobin budget fart!
PS: Only the dead visible on the screen are counted, so exit the planet’s destruction coughs cough.
10. “We were Soldiers” by Randall Wallace
In the movie We Were Soldiers with Mel Gibson released in 2002, you could witness the death of no fewer than 305 people. Just that.
9. “Titanic” by James Cameron
Titanic is not only the film that makes you chialer, it is also one of the films that counts the greatest number of deaths (ah bah both so linked in fact …). There are 307 deaths in this film!
8. John Woo’s “Foolproof”
In Hard Boiled , the film directed by John Woo we are witnessing the death of 308 people.
7. “The Boulevard of Death” by Quentin Tarantino
Quentin Tarantino is a bloody director. The proof, in his film Boulevard de la mort , it ends the days of no less than 310 people.
6. “The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers” by Peter Jackson
It dies of phew in The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers . There are no less than 468 deaths in this second installment of the Lord of the Rings saga.
5. “The Last Samurai” by Edward Zick
The Last Samurai released in 2003 is a bloody film. The casualties amount to 558. Small anecdote: Tom Cruise almost died on the set. In fact, the actor did not decapitate during the filming of one of the scenes of combat of the film (that of the beginning in the fog) . The actor was on a robotic horse supposed to tilt him back at the time of a sword thrust. The system did not work, but the actor Hiroyuki Sanada managed to stop his blade a few centimeters from the star’s neck. Phew.
4. “Troy” by Wolfgang Petersen
Deaths, deaths everywhere in this film with Brad Pitt, Orlando Bloom, Diane Kruger and Sean Bean. There are 572 people who die in this film.
3. “300” by Zack Snyder
300×2 = 600. It is the pile-hair the number of deaths that count in this film.
2. “Kingdom of Heaven” by Ridley Scott
The movie Kingdom of Heaven by Ridley Scott with Orlando Bloom and Liam Neeson counts 610 deaths, OKLM.
1. “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King” by Peter Jackson
The film The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King directed by Peter Jackson not only has the record of the number of Oscars (cucou the 11 statuettes). No, the work can also claim to count the greatest number of deaths with its 836 victims.

The post The 10 deadliest movies, the hemoglobin budget has exploded! first appeared on The Siver Times.

These movies where scenes were modified in scred ‘after the release

sivertime — Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:51:45 +0000

Between the release version at the beginning and then the reruns later, or the release on DVD, some are slightly different. Examples and explanations.
It is true that it is tempting. You go out a thing that you do not like 100%, you have a regret, an improvement to bring, a polemic to manage, then hop, a little touch and we assure the blow for the version that will now broadcast. Not crazy the wasp. Except that sometimes, it is known, it shows. And that’s not always a good idea.
Disney erases a bar from “The Little Mermaid”
When Ursula and Prince Eric get married, they face a normal churchman. What is less, it is the rod of the guy in question, that we see well push the pants … It is even the impression that Ursula blocked, embarrassed . Just like some viewers, then Disney will edit it digitally later. The illustrator will explain that it was a knee, nothing else. Maybe, but in doubt, they wiped out that little bump that stressed everyone.
The special edition of Spielberg for “Encounters of the third type”
In summary, the studio forced Spielberg to include the ending scene where one sees the interior of the spaceship. He did not want it and thought it useless. He explained that the studio faced the bankruptcy and had to leave the film quickly, so he had executed. Well, let’s admit. Later, he released a special edition without it. So, it changes the film . And James Cameron gave his opinion: it was a bullshit and it screwed up the movie which was fine as it was out.
Cameron polishes the starry sky in “Titanic”
Historical success, this film has fueled 11 Oscars and awards in general. The story, the play of the actors, the beauty of the scenes, the taf upstream to rebuild the boat … A colossal work. And still, small details were further improved after its release. Some criticized the overflow of light and lighting during certain scenes. Then it was corrected. More whew, the letter of a physicist named Neil deGrasse Tyon, who mocked Cameron explaining that Rose would never have seen that sky , with these stars tonight in 1912, given the Position of the boat and the time of year. Obsessed with the details, James Cameron changed this, to be consistent with the remarks of Mr. Know-Everything.
Coppola adds sex between ghosts in “Apocalypse Now”
Difficult not to notice this, between the movie exit and that of the Redux. We see the future President Martin Sheen, accompanied by his soldiers, stop in a French plantation, during their march. And after dinner, marked by a very serious discussion about the history of Vietnam, the future president climbs into a room and sleeps with one of the hosts. After taking opium . Well, already, you have to want to add that, we do not see too much delirium. In addition, it looks like a dumpling because from a historical point of view, the French had already fucked the camp at this time of the Vietnam War. More planting normally. Then Francis brought out his excuse: it was scenes of travel in time, with ghosts. Mouai.
Wacky scenes in the special edition of “The Night of the Living Dead”
If you see so many zombies on TV or movie today, you have to thank George Romero, who made this film in 1968. Such a pioneer. And if you do not kiffes, you can blame him. In any case, when the film was released, the title was changed at the last minute and the producers forgot to indicate his name on the tape. Farewell copyright, hello modification à foison. Then in the 90s, it was the co-writer John A. Russo who was pleased by adding scenes to explain the origin of the original zombie . He was a ready rapist, buried by two assholes. The images of the 90s do not denote at all with those of the 60s, nickel … And it goes on, with other ridiculous scenes of zombies, the ready who eats the face of a guy, A dog … The guy made his birthday present and stained the film. So, is it really necessary to touch up a work already diffused?

The post These movies where scenes were modified in scred ‘after the release first appeared on The Siver Times.

These movies are out there 20 years ago, the cow how fast it goes

sivertime — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 17:49:58 +0000

It is often said that years pass by at an incredible speed, and that is true. Proof is, it is already two decades that we speak (in good) of these films.

Men in Black
So at the beginning of his career, Will Smith chained successes, commercial at least. After the series “The Prince of Bel-Air”, he directed “Bad Boys”, “Independance Day” and “Men in Black” in three (1995 to 1997). It definitely propels the very top of the poster . Twenty years later, Will Smith still carries his beautiful mouth of movies in movies. Tommy Lee Jones too, while making an older chouia …
The fifth element
If there are fans of original hairstyles among you, I bet they had loved this small movie. Bruce Willis’ blonde platinum dyeing, Milla Jovovich’s almost blinding freak, Chris Tucker’s crazy banana: There was everything. Besides the capillary freestyle, it is probably the best film of Luc Besson .
Titanic
The movie that had swollen all the guys back then. And delighted all the chicks. Why ? Already because watching a movie where the love story occupies the major part of the plot, it’s relou. And when it lasts 3:15, you fest a cable. Finally, you heard all the chicks flag themselves saying “Oh it is beautiful Leo” and you ignore kind “clear tocard with your teeth crooked and your clothes badly trimmed”. From year to year, Leo was forgiven. It is too strong, it is more than a beautiful mouth.
Welcome to Gattaca
When you usually look at “Dragon Ball”, check it out. Suddenly, must reflect, analyze … You see that behind the images, it goes something much more important . And everyone will tell you for years, until today. So you see him again and you confirm: yes, it’s a crazy movie. In addition, with Ethan Hawke, Jude Law and Uma Thurman, the cast was not at all possible.
Austin Powers
Because film quality does not necessarily rhyme with seriousness, stake and position. Making people laugh is not easy, quite the contrary . One only has to look at the number of “comedies” coming out and collecting each year. But here we had the chance to see a classic, animated by Mike Myers in full form and perfect.
Will Hunting
Matt Damon and Ben Affleck apparently wanted to show everyone that they were not tocards. So they wrote a screenplay, saw Gus Van Sant seize it and played the first two roles story to shine thoroughly. Accompanied by Robin Williams, Damon, Affleck and the film calm everyone: nine nominations and two awards at the Oscars . The best screenplay, precisely, and the best supporting role for the guy of experience cited above. And hey, everybody is happy.
Jacky Brown
The film confirmed the famous expression: “Never two without three.” In this case, about the success of Quentin Tarantino, who then released his third feature film in theaters ( “Groom Service” being released directly into VOD) after “Reservoir Dogs” and “Pulp Fiction”. And it was a bet on several points: tribute to the films of Blaxploitation, adaptation of a novel (“Punch Creole” in VF) and main roles to two past fashion actors, Pam Grier and Robert Forster. Otherwise, there’s also Samuel L. Jackson, Robert De Niro, Michael Keaton, Bridget Fonda … Which do you prefer?

The post These movies are out there 20 years ago, the cow how fast it goes first appeared on The Siver Times.

You get annoyed at the end of the film and you are not talking about the same

sivertime — Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:45:21 +0000

It’s kind of the thing that changes everything so it’s better to know if you’re talking about the same as your buddy. Serious? Yes, these films show different purposes. Truthful.
The most vicious: two ends at the theatrical release
“Hide and Seek” is not the most famous films in which De Niro plays and yet there would be reasons . Already because he encamped a doctor a little specious, far from his most famous roles. And especially because the director John Polson decided to offer two ends to the spectators. In the cinema, indoors. I would like to know the number of misunderstandings between the people who talked about it …
The classics: an alternative ending on the DVD
Nothing surprising, it is both a means for the real ‘and the prod’ to show the other track that had been dug and a “reward” to the buyer who will have an anecdote to tell in exchange Of the 22 balls he dropped. “And did you say thank you?” . Examples: ” Titanic,” “Salt,” “Final Destination 3”, “I Am Legend,” “Scream 4″ .
Public opinion: a comprehensible and adapted end
As when a company wants to release a product and ensure its success, it confronts it upstream to a limited audience. An important test phase. And when the majority does not like a proposed end, bah you fall back on the second and worse. Or you rework the first, you modify it a little so that it passes. Examples: ” Fight Club” (flashbacks added to make it more understandable), “Snake Eyes”, “Brazil” (a happy end to the Yanks, sad for Europeans).
The urgency of the competition: an end with a montage … not finished
Presented at Cannes in 1979, “Apocalypse Now” was not then a final version . A kind of work in progress. So, when Coppola’s film came out on DVD, the editing was over and had somewhat changed the end. Who were you aware of? And you saw both ends?

The post You get annoyed at the end of the film and you are not talking about the same first appeared on The Siver Times.