<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>American Psycho | The Siver Times</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sivertimes.com/tag/american-psycho/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sivertimes.com</link>
	<description>news and analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Authors who hated the cine adaptation of their book</title>
		<link>https://sivertimes.com/authors-who-hated-the-cine-adaptation-of-their-book/46233</link>
					<comments>https://sivertimes.com/authors-who-hated-the-cine-adaptation-of-their-book/46233#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sivertime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptation film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Psycho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brothel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fatigue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flight over a cuckoo's nest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forrest Gump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kubrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tangles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Shining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Hanks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sivertimes.com/?p=46233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The cinema killed me&#8221;. The transition from paper to the big screen is necessarily a complex exercise that leads to mixed reactions among readers, but also among authors. For an esteemed saga like Harry Potter, whose cast has almost been different , a bunch of other films, often adored by critics, have been massacred by &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://sivertimes.com/authors-who-hated-the-cine-adaptation-of-their-book/46233" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Authors who hated the cine adaptation of their book"</span></a></p>
The post <a href="https://sivertimes.com/authors-who-hated-the-cine-adaptation-of-their-book/46233">Authors who hated the cine adaptation of their book</a> first appeared on <a href="https://sivertimes.com">The Siver Times</a>.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;The cinema killed me&#8221;.</strong><br />
<img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" onerror="this.src='https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/12/noimage500.png'" src="https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/06/american-psycho-serie-adaptation-film-730x276.jpg" alt="" width="730" height="276" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-46234" srcset="https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/06/american-psycho-serie-adaptation-film-730x276.jpg 730w, https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/06/american-psycho-serie-adaptation-film-768x290.jpg 768w, https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/06/american-psycho-serie-adaptation-film-150x57.jpg 150w, https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/06/american-psycho-serie-adaptation-film.jpg 1020w" sizes="(max-width: 730px) 100vw, 730px" />The transition from paper to the big screen is necessarily a complex exercise that leads to mixed reactions among readers, but also among authors. For an esteemed saga like Harry Potter, whose cast has almost been different , a bunch of other films, often adored by critics, have been massacred by the brains behind the original work. Do not touch my book!<br />
<strong>Stephen King &#8211; &#8220;Shining&#8221;</strong><br />
The master of the horror novel sees red as soon as he is told about Stanley Kubrick&#8217;s film, which would have totally distorted his work as he told Rolling Stone magazine: &#8220;The book is hot, the film is cold; Book ends in flame, the film ends in the ice &#8221; . Among the main grievances is the lack of nuance in the character of Jack Torrance : &#8220;In my book, there is a narrative sequence where Jack Torrance tries to be good, and it is gradually that he arrives at a Stage of madness (&#8230;) When I saw the film, Jack appeared to me insane from the first scene &#8221; . But the worst character remains according to him, that of Wendy, who would only shout from beginning to end (&#8220;a screaming mop&#8221;<br />
<strong>Bret Easton Ellis &#8211; &#8220;American Psycho&#8221;</strong><br />
The author has always maintained that his novel was impossible to transpose on screen because he is interested in consciousness and &#8220;we can not really show the complexity of this sensitivity . &#8221; The film would make the character of Patrick Bateman for a monster, when the novel &#8220;is much more ambiguous&#8221; . It was not more tender with the adaptation of &#8220;The Informers&#8221; in 2008, film on which he nevertheless worked the script but which made a real oven to the cinema. &#8220;This film does not work for a lot of reason, but I do not think any of these reasons come from me . &#8221; The art of questioning &#8230;<br />
<strong>Uderzo &#8211; &#8220;Asterix and Obelix: Mission Cleopatra&#8221;</strong><br />
Co-author of the comic strip with Goscinny (died in 1977), Uderzo is the one who still preserves the Gallic spirit of Asterix and Obelix. And it has long been said that the draftsman / scriptwriter had little taste of the 2nd opus released in the cinema, &#8220;Asterix and Obelix: Mission Cleopatra&#8221; . He reproached Alain Chabat for having distanced himself from the original work, with a much too much Canal humor, and secondary characters that erased Asterix and Obelix. Albert Uderzo, who was certainly cornered by the 15 million spectators who went to theaters, and the cult status of the film, now prefers to temper, assuring him that he is not angry with Alain Chabat: &#8220;I was just A bit annoyed because it is not what I &#8216;<br />
<strong>Roald Dahl &#8211; &#8220;Charlie and the Chocolate Factory&#8221;</strong><br />
It&#8217;s a constant: Roald Dahl hates all the adaptations of his books. With a fierce hatred for the most famous of them, the &#8220;Charlie and the Chocolaterie&#8221; of 1971 . Pell-mell, he said the film is &#8220;lame&#8221; , director Mel Stuart &#8220;has no talent&#8221; , and as for Gene Wilder &#8211; the actor who plays Willy Wonka &#8211; &#8220;it was pretentious and not dynamic enough for the role &#8221; .<br />
<strong>Ken Kesey &#8211; &#8220;Flying over a Cuckoo&#8217;s Nest&#8221;</strong><br />
Despite the 1976 Oscars (Best Film, Best Director, Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Script), Ken Kesey never wore the adaptation of Milos Forman in his heart. While basically, he was motivated by the project and had joined the trick, before slamming the door &#8230; two weeks later. He has long recounted that he had never seen the film, although his wife confessed after his death, that he was pleased that the feature was born.<br />
<strong>Richard Matheson &#8211; &#8220;I&#8217;m a Legend&#8221;</strong><br />
For Richard Matheson, the cinema has lacked respect twice to his work. In 1964 first, where &#8220;The Last Man on Earth&#8221; did not really pack it: &#8220;I am disappointed by this film even if they have more or less followed my story . &#8221; Although he appreciated it a lot, the main actor Vincent Price was &#8220;a casting error&#8221; . Same in 2007 with the Will Smith version which will make him say: &#8220;I do not understand why Hollywood is so fascinated by my book while nobody there ever takes the trouble to film it as I wrote . &#8221;<br />
<strong>Winstom Groom &#8211; &#8220;Forrest Gump&#8221;</strong><br />
Winstom Groom was downright bad. He is one of the few to spit on Robert Zemeckis&#8217; film, which would have distorted his work, obscuring important moments of the book, as well as raw language and sex scenes. The choice of Tom Hanks appeared to him as fanciful since in his book, Forrest Gump measures 2m and weighs 110 kgs (he wanted the actor John Goodman instead). Although Winston Groom has not been revered for financial reasons, despite having negotiated a 3% profit on the Paramount, the studio did not spin it, as the film would have Lost money. He will sue them and win. Very well, he wrote in 1995, in the following of his novel: &#8220;Never leave someone&#8221;</p>The post <a href="https://sivertimes.com/authors-who-hated-the-cine-adaptation-of-their-book/46233">Authors who hated the cine adaptation of their book</a> first appeared on <a href="https://sivertimes.com">The Siver Times</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://sivertimes.com/authors-who-hated-the-cine-adaptation-of-their-book/46233/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The movies you have to watch at least twice to capture everything in history</title>
		<link>https://sivertimes.com/the-movies-you-have-to-watch-at-least-twice-to-capture-everything-in-history/24617</link>
					<comments>https://sivertimes.com/the-movies-you-have-to-watch-at-least-twice-to-capture-everything-in-history/24617#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sivertime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28 days later]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Cure For Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Psycho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Another Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baratin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAYS OF SUMMER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disruptive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donnie Darko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fight Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Miss Sunshine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mytho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reservoir dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shutter Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sixth Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the beasts of the South wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Shining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WELCOME to the dollhouse]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sivertimes.com/?p=24617</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Be nice, rewind. If there are many (too many) movies that do not even deserve to be watched once, next to it, you have some nuggets that force you to violate the replay button for a second (or even several) sessions Of viewing . Not that you are taken for a stupid one who did &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://sivertimes.com/the-movies-you-have-to-watch-at-least-twice-to-capture-everything-in-history/24617" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The movies you have to watch at least twice to capture everything in history"</span></a></p>
The post <a href="https://sivertimes.com/the-movies-you-have-to-watch-at-least-twice-to-capture-everything-in-history/24617">The movies you have to watch at least twice to capture everything in history</a> first appeared on <a href="https://sivertimes.com">The Siver Times</a>.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Be nice, rewind.</strong><br />
<img decoding="async" onerror="this.src='https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/12/noimage500.png'" src="http://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/02/fight-club-730x275.jpg" alt="" width="730" height="275" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-24618" srcset="https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/02/fight-club-730x275.jpg 730w, https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/02/fight-club-768x289.jpg 768w, https://s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/sivertimes/2017/02/fight-club.jpg 1020w" sizes="(max-width: 730px) 100vw, 730px" />If there are many (too many) movies that do not even deserve to be watched once, next to it, you have some nuggets that force you to violate the replay button for a second (or even several) sessions Of viewing . Not that you are taken for a stupid one who did not understand at first, but the very nature of the feature film, which often breaks down with a stunning final twist, forces us to reconsider things from a new point of view. view. ( Attention: immense SPOILERS have slipped into this article ).<br />
<strong>Memento</strong><br />
A film that completely disconcerts you, like the hero Leonard Shelby (Guy Pearce), who suffers from an amnesia causing him to tattoo on the body a whole bunch of info to find the murderer of his wife. Michael Scoffield is a little player next to this guy. But where the magic of Christopher Nolan operates, it is in the tortuous montage of the scenes, which follows a particular chronology based on flashbacks and leaks forward . Until the final climax (which actually corresponds to the middle of the story). In short, a hardcore movie to pitcher, so go and watch it. And preferably twice.<br />
<strong>The Army of 12 Monkeys</strong><br />
Another story about mabouls. By 2035, the world had only a handful of survivors who had taken refuge in the earth after the spread of a deadly virus. Scientists decide to send Cole (Bruce Willis) in the past to discover the origin of this virus, which they think has been dropped by &#8220;The Army of Twelve Apes,&#8221; a mysterious group of animal defenses . There, Cole will meet Jeffrey Goines (Brad Pitt), who is initially a tart in an asylum, then a few years later, the leader of the Army of the Twelve Apes. Throughout the film, Cole will ask himself if he is not hallucinating, and if the scientists of 2035 are not the mere fruit of his imagination.<br />
<strong>Donnie Darko</strong><br />
Just to understand the end of this film really ché-per, a second viewing is necessary. Donnie (Jake Gyllenhaal) is a brilliant but a little disturbed teenager, who has an imaginary friend resembling a rather creepy humanoid rabbit: Frank. The latter announces to him &#8211; one night when the teen almost clamored &#8211; that there are only 28 days, 6 hours, 42 minutes and 12 seconds before the end of the world . During all this morbid countdown, Donnie will obey a lot of orders blown by Frank, with each time unsuspected chain reactions. To watch again and again !<br />
<strong>Fight Club</strong><br />
Shunned for its release, &#8220;Fight Club&#8221; has become over time a classic, not least for its savage violence, its anti-consumerist replicas and mega final twist: Tyler Durden is like the spoon in Matrix , it n &#8216;does not exist. Cracked up by Brad Pitt (again) is only an avatar of the disturbed mind of the Narrator (Edward Norton) . An avatar that bumps hard and wants to fuck up society, because &#8220;she has too many problems . &#8221; This good old Tyler is disturbing and prints itself in your mind in the same way as the dicks that it incruste in the movies family of the cinema where it works &#8230;<br />
<strong>Prestige</strong><br />
&#8220;Each magic trick has three parts, or acts: the first is called the promise: the magician presents something ordinary to you: the second act is called the trick: the magician uses this ordinary thing to make him accomplish something But you can not bring yourself to applause, because to make something disappear is insufficient, you still have to get it back, so you seek the secret but you do not find it because, of course, you Do not look carefully. You do not really want to know &#8230; You want to be fooled . &#8221; Dupé, it is indeed the feeling that animates us at the end of this new magic trick of Christopher Nolan, Which reveals to us the end of the rivalry between two ambitious and unscrupulous magicians during a stunning twist . A must see twice, as the number of Christian Bale in this film &#8230;<br />
<strong>Old Boy</strong><br />
Removed and sequestered without reason for 15 years with a TV for only cell companion, Oh Dae-su is released one day without further explanations. In his quest for truth, he binds friendship and then love with Mi-do, a young girl who has collected him . Then he discovers the identity of his executioner: Lee Woo-jin, a former schoolmate he had caught fucking with his own sister. The rumor spread throughout the school had prompted the miss to commit suicide. Lee organized his revenge by pushing Oh Dae-su to incest and to sleep with his own daughter, who was none other than &#8230; Mi-do . In short, one of the greatest masterpieces of South Korean cinema.<br />
<strong>Usual Suspects</strong><br />
The cup of coffee that breaks to the ground. Looks at the back wall. The shameful name-dropping of &#8220;Verbal&#8221; Kint. And the truth that bursts out in the face of Inspector Kujan. A cult epilogue for a thriller who built his legend around the mysterious Keyser Söze : a bloodthirsty criminal that everyone speaks but that no one has ever seen. Well, it was before they all realized (far too late) that he was a shabby, shabby little lame trick who deceived his whole world. &#8220;The most cunning blow the devil ever made was to make everyone believe that he did not exist . &#8221;<br />
<strong>Shutter Island</strong><br />
Tired or not tared? This is the only question that gnaws at us at the end of this psychological drama of Martin Scorsese with the immense DiCaprio in the lead role. The beautiful kid goes to investigate the disappearance of a patient of a haunted asylum lost in the middle of an island. In the course of his investigations, marshall Teddy Daniels is gradually losing ground, to the point of being persuaded by the hospital staff, that he is in reality one of the patients of the asylum and that this &#8220;mission&#8221; is only An invention forming part of its therapy . I confess that every time I finish this film, I end up as lost as him &#8230;<br />
<strong>Inception</strong><br />
Ah bah, here&#8217;s another film that leaves me in the fog. And I&#8217;m not the only one in view of all the theories that continue to flow on the net: did this damn spinning stopped spinning or not? In other words, does the final happy ending, which sees Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio there again) find his children is an umpteenth dream or reality? &#8220;The question of whether it is a dream or not is that I get asked the most. It matters to people because it is the essence of reality. Reality account&#8221; , has recognized the Director Christopher Nolan at a lecture at Princeton University, adding, &#8220;At the end of this film, the character of Leonardo DiCaprio, Cobb, Finds himself with his children, at least in his subjective reality. He has nothing more to do (to know if he is in his real life, note) and it says something: maybe all levels of reality are valid . &#8221; You are more advanced than before ?<br />
<strong>The Sixth Sense</strong><br />
Certainly the final twist that has most marked the general public and which is the authentic in the schools of cinema. Night Shyamalan walked the length of the film with the patient psycho / patient relationship between Dr. Malcolm Crowe (Bruce Willis) and Cole, a kid who &#8220;sees the dead&#8221; . In fact, the dead man he saw most often was none other than his stubborn psychic who still imagined himself alive, the cunt . The film &#8220;The Others&#8221; follows very closely the same frame.</p>The post <a href="https://sivertimes.com/the-movies-you-have-to-watch-at-least-twice-to-capture-everything-in-history/24617">The movies you have to watch at least twice to capture everything in history</a> first appeared on <a href="https://sivertimes.com">The Siver Times</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://sivertimes.com/the-movies-you-have-to-watch-at-least-twice-to-capture-everything-in-history/24617/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: sivertimes.com @ 2025-12-16 11:57:41 by W3 Total Cache
-->