Beware of this phrase: “Anyway it’s always better at the movies”

If the film itself does not change, it is all sides to it that can rot. Despite the beautiful screen and the powerful sound, the environment is not optimal.
Let us pass over the price of the square, factor inherent in going to the cinema. That’s the basis, so we have to accept it. Even though taro is increasingly prohibitive, let’s leave it aside. We’ll talk about the rest, about what’s around. Services, people, conditions … that make watching a film at home, posed, is not so naze that it finally . And anyway, people who swing phrases with “always” (or never) in them are inevitably exaggerating, caught in flag ‘.
You pay 10 balls for a 25 cl stem and two chemical bullshit
You ate at the snatch because you were pressed for time (so a surely healthy and balanced style burger / kebab and so on), you have done fast walking like Yohann Diniz (in transportation, in the Street) and so you … thirsty. With the inevitable advertisements, you have for at least two hours. Not to say two and a half hours. And it goes up according to the duration of the film eh … So you crack, you take your little bottle. At € 3.50. That you save, otherwise you break it in 4 mouthfuls . And history, you complete with two tricks very chemical, salty or sweet, and hop, here you are with a ticket of 10 € less. While at home, it’s open bar. And it’s cheaper.
You can not stretch your legs on the coffee table
Whatever the cinema you go to, the comfort will not be the same. Your freedom either. A fat seat, good armrests, ok, you can have it. But your legs? Folded. So you try to relax them a little by playing on the breadth. It is also dead, for you are stamping the feet of the seats, or those of your neighbor . And then shit, even if you could, you’re not a gymnast and do not hit big gaps. Nothing better than a sofa and a coffee table.
You have to stop yourself from going pissing
There is a purely psychological side, we agree. Normally, holding two hours without going to the pits is not behind the scenes of the feat. It’s just the pressure to know that you do not have the choice to give you the pressure. And when you start thinking about it, it’s not good. Classic . If you go out, you miss a piece of film. And you shit everybody. And everyone looks at you with a sneering look at your return. With you, no problem: pause, mission, reading. Efficient and discreet.
You risk having your eyes blocked by a big, or a hairy one
Clearly a point to improve. Why not insist more and increase the slope? Frankly, 2/3% more tilt, what would it change? Nothing for the room which has largely the height under ceiling. And everything for people of small sizes who see their session take a bad turn when a guy of 1.85m is placed just in front of them. Or that he has a cup of anarcho-musico-thick-largo-artist. Seeing a cap as tall as it was bad taste. And you, behind, as soon as it moves, you’re like that …
Your probability of missing the session is multiplied
When you arrive 3 min before the start of the session by chanting “vaaaaa, we are wide!” , That you arrive at the boxes and that you realize that it is dead. The room is full, people are motivated and you have it in … the bone . Then there are two schools: those who go to eat and drink in the meantime, those who give up. And if it was the last session, bah you repaulted. Another failure that would never be (if, it happens in fact, we can) arrived at home. What is the percentage of “Do not pronounce” at the end of this article?